We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is a Weasel Word?

By Wanda Marie Thibodeaux
Updated Feb 10, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At DelightedCooking, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A weasel word is a word, phrase or sentence, or organizational setup that contains ambiguity and which therefore doesn't reflect the whole truth. People use these words when they want to give the impression what they are saying is important but don't want to commit to a specific claim or data set. The term comes from the way weasels eat eggs, sucking the matter out and leaving nothing but a shell. Weasel words can occur in any writing or speech, but they are standard in areas such as politics, advertising and corporate business.

Ambiguity is a hallmark of weasel words. A problem with weasel words thus is that their meaning depends on context, which depends on the surrounding culture. Without experience, a person can miss one or more of the interpretations possible.

As an individual word, a weasel word functions as a modifier. Examples are words such as probably, virtually, most, some or often. These words create a sense of how many or when, but they are not specific in number, statistics or dates. The lack of specificity causes trained individuals such as editors to regard the inclusions of weasel words as useless and as evidence of lack of sufficient effort or research.

Weasel words as phrases can be oxymorons or euphemisms. For instance, a person might say "virtually universal." Universal implies that everyone has or does something, but virtually means nearly or almost, thereby canceling out the meaning of universal. Similarly, a company might soften the blow of layoffs by calling the release of workers "leveraging new opportunities" or "streamlining operations." Non sequitur or irrelevant statements also are weasel words, such as if a company says they are "the leader in shoes" without giving information that allows for a comparison to the company's competitors.

A sentence also can be a weasel word. An example of this is "This event is beyond words." This sentence could mean that the person is pleased or impressed with the event, or it could mean that the person is struck by the event's lack of fun, quality or professionalism. People also create weasel word sentences by using questions to make implications, such as by saying, "Do we want to continue under the leadership of someone with this record?" This question implies that the leader has done a poor job, but it does not come out and say anything negative outright, and it does not provide specific data about what is within the record that might be offensive or harmful.

The passive voice hides weasel words, as well. If a person says, "It is said...," for example, the reader or listener has no way of knowing who said what follows. Thus, the writer or speaker avoids specificity about the origin of what he communicates, even though he depends on the authority of that origin.

Organizational setup weasel words occur in documents or tools such as surveys. When a person looks at individual parts of such documents, a problem doesn't exist. When put together, however, one part may imply how a person should interpret the next section.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By pollick — On Feb 01, 2014

I think if the fact is clearly indisputable, then a writer should avoid using ambiguous weasel words. It does start to sound like a cop out if every sentence contains "most" or "some" or "possibly". But I can understand where playing it safe with a qualifier might prevent some angry responses from readers who *know* beyond any doubt that a fact is unassailable.

By Phaedrus — On Jan 31, 2014

It's easy to fall into the trap of using weasel words. I used to write short informative articles for an online company (not WiseGEEK), and the editor would insist I qualify a lot of things. I was supposed to leave a little wiggle room when it came to facts. There was always a chance someone was going to be the odd man out, and that was the person who was going to complain to the owner. The same thing happened with the default pronoun setting "his". It routinely became "his or her", and people would actually complain if the language was too gender specific.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.