We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

Who is "the Man"?

By Brendan McGuigan
Updated Jan 31, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

“The Man” is a term used to describe any person or organization in power. It may be applied by blacks to describe whites in power, or it may be applied by any countercultural movement to describe the group they see as the oppressor. Many people will also describe their boss as “The Man,” especially when there is a perceived case of oppression or domination.

As a positive term, “The Man” may be used to describe someone who is at the pinnacle of his craft, or somehow possessing a perceived superiority over all others. This sense of the word dates back to at least the mid-19th century, when it can be seen in many written texts. This sense of “The Man” in the modern world is primarily linked with African American slang, but over the past few years it has become more pervasive throughout society and is now frequently heard in many segments of American culture.

The first recorded use of the phrase “The Man” to describe a boss figure shows up in 1918, but it is likely that the phrase had its origins much earlier than that. Some historians have suggested that “The Man” was a shortening of the phrase “Bank Man” used by African Americans in the post-Civil War South, describing someone who was constantly hassling them about failing to make payments on time. The term then became generalized to anyone who hassled a group of people, and eventually just to anyone who was in a position of dominance that they were perceived to be abusing.

Although used for decades before, it wasn’t until the 1960s that “The Man” began to see widespread usage in the United States. It was used early on by the black militant movement to describe the white oppressors that the movement was fighting against. A number of newspaper quotes from the era use the term, and it quickly gained currency, both among black activists and those who struggled in solidarity with them.

By the late 1960s “The Man” was being used by a number of different countercultural groups to describe the perceived oppressors they were fighting against. Most often “The Man” described the government or a specific government group, but it could also be applied to a single individual, seen as particularly representative of larger oppressive policies. The term may also be used to describe an amorphous, unspecified agency of oppression, seen as being responsible for any number of ills in the world.

There are a number of common phrases that use the term, generally in the pejorative sense. For example, if you are feeling that your life is not going according to plan, or that you can’t catch a break, you might say that “The Man is keeping you down.” This implies that an outside force is actively seeking to keep you from succeeding. When you are setting out to struggle against an established force in the world, especially in a radical or protest-oriented fashion, you might talk about “Sticking it to The Man.”

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By Cageybird — On Jan 08, 2015

@RocketLanch8- I'm afraid I had an entirely different experience with a person we called "the man" at work. He was truly one of the most repressive bosses I ever had, and he really enjoyed his power trips. He was in charge, and we were never allowed to forget it. He'd schedule meetings to discuss an upcoming project, and we all thought he was interested in our ideas. After we all presented our thoughts, he would go from person to person and point out at least one major flaw in his or her ideas. It really didn't matter if it was a good idea or not, he was going to do it his way anyway and he wanted to keep us all off-balance.

By RocketLanch8 — On Jan 07, 2015

I've heard this expression used in a positive way, usually to describe someone who is clearly an expert in his or her field. Whenever my department would have a problem with a computer, I always told them to take it straight to Ted in the IT department. Ted was "the man" when it came to computer repairs, as far as I was concerned. I think I would be very flattered if anyone ever considered me to be "the man" at something.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.