We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is the Plural of Hippopotamus?

By G. Wiesen
Updated Feb 15, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The plural of hippopotamus is “hippopotamuses,” though in many contexts, the Latin plural form of “hippopotami” can also be used. While both plural forms are relatively acceptable, especially when used in informal contexts, many dictionaries list “hippopotamuses” as the first entry for the plural of hippopotamus. Despite this, however, many people feel that “hippopotamuses” seems silly, both visually and when said aloud, and often reminds people of the over-pronunciation of the word in the song I Want a Hippopotamus for Christmas. This causes many people to use the other form of “hippopotami” instead, though the increased usage of “hippo” has also lead to the use of “hippos” in many instances.

Since there are essentially two correct words that can be used as the plural, there can be a great deal of confusion over which word someone should use. If someone is trying to pluralize the word “hippopotamus” in a formal context, such as a school paper or for a work report, then the word “hippopotamuses” should typically be used. This is considered the correct plural in English and avoids any of the issues that may arise from using the Latin form. Despite the fact that this may seem lengthy or somewhat silly in appearance, it is correct English and should be accepted by any teacher or employer.

The word “hippopotami” is also correct as the plural of hippopotamus, however. Since this uses the Latin plural form, it may be considered somewhat informal or inappropriate in some settings in which the English plural may be preferred. This depends a great deal on the individual preferences of those who may be reading or hearing the words, however, so people looking to use the plural of hippopotamus in a school paper or report should consult their teacher to ensure proper usage for that setting.

Since the word hippopotamus has been shortened to “hippo” in many settings, the use of the plural word “hippos” can also avoid the entire issue regarding the plural of hippopotamus. This shortening is often seen as a very informal word, however, so it should usually be avoided in contexts in which formality is needed, such as scholarly or business writings. When spoken aloud, however, the word “hippopotamuses” can become laborious to say, and so “hippos” is often acceptable in that context. Like many animals, a gathering of hippopotamuses has a particular name and such a group is referred to as a “bloat” of hippopotamuses.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By bear78 — On Jan 09, 2015

I'm sure that hippopotami are not dangerous as long as one leaves them alone. Any wild animal is bound to feel threatened when humans get too close. They are not domesticated so they need to be given their space.

As for which plural of the word is correct, the article has already clarified the answer. Hippopotamuses is right. I say hippopotami out of habit. I don't think my English teachers ever taught this. I must have come to this conclusion on my own because I did take Latin in college and the -i addix seems like the logical one when hippopotamus is made plural.

By ysmina — On Jan 09, 2015

@umbra21-- I recently learned that hippopotamuses kill many humans every year. It was a shocking bit of news to me. When I was a child, I had a hippopotamus stuffed animal with two little baby hippopotamuses in its front pocket. It was my favorite stuffed animal and I played with it for years. So it's difficult to digest that they're not very friendly animals.

By literally45 — On Jan 09, 2015

I'd personally either use hippopotami or hippos when referring to the plural of hippopotamus. I think these just sound better. I realize that students should stick with "hippopotamuses" in their assignments. But in regular conversation, I wouldn't want to use that. Even though it may be the correct form, it just sounds incorrect and strange. It's good to know what the dictionary says is correct though. This discussion itself could be a nice conversation ice-breaker.

By Fa5t3r — On Jan 03, 2015

@umbra21 - They might look awkward on land, but they can actually outrun a human, which is another reason they can be deadly. So I don't think it's that strange they were named after horses.

Although apparently they are most closely related to whales and dolphins. And I also want to point out that they are a threatened species, so you can hardly blame them for being aggressive towards humans.

By umbra21 — On Jan 02, 2015

@browncoat - Well, I can definitely see why there might be a negative term for a group of hippos. I mean, they are one of the most deadly animals in Africa in terms of human deaths. And they aren't even killing for food or when they feel like they are threatened. Apparently they are just bad tempered and will crush anyone who makes them mad.

And, frankly, they look kind of bloated. I mean, I think they are cute as well, particularly the baby ones, but they have very tightly stretched looking skin and they are heavy-set, because they spend most of their time in the water. I think the word is very appropriate. Probably more so than the word hippopotamus itself, which basically means "river horse". I'm not sure a four legged animal could look more different from a horse.

By browncoat — On Jan 01, 2015

I'm not sure I approve of the group of hippos being known as a "bloat" of hippos. They are actually quite cute and interesting creatures and the word bloat just seems like it's completely negative.

I usually like using the correct word for a group of animals, because it usually seems much more fitting than a generic word, but I think in this case I might just keep calling them a herd.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.