We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Difference Between "Lets" and "Let's?"

Dan Cavallari
By Dan Cavallari
Updated Jan 24, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The words "lets" and "let's" are very commonly confused because they sound exactly the same. The difference exists only on paper, but the difference is an important one. The word "lets" is a verb, or action word, that means "to allow." The word "let's" is a contraction that means "let us." The word "lets" also has other meanings, while "let's" is only the contraction of "let us." The difference between "lets" and "let's" does not matter during verbal communication, as both words sound identical, but in written English, the difference between "lets" and "let's" is important and worth knowing.

A few examples help to clarify the difference between "lets" and "let's."

John lets the dog outside every morning.

Let's go to the supermarket for potato chips and soda.

In the first sentence, John is performing an action; he is letting the dog go outside, but he is doing it in the present tense. Since John is not the first person (I), or the second person (you), this means he is the third person (he, she, it, or a proper noun). The word "lets" is therefore the third person singular of the verb "let."

In the second sentence, the contraction, or shortened form, of the words "let us" is used. If you replace "let's" with the expanded form, the sentence reads like this:

Let us go to the supermarket for potatoes and chips.

The meaning does not change; the words are simply shortened to make the sentence flow better and to make the sentence easier to say out loud. The difference between "lets" and "let's" becomes apparent when you consider contractions in general, such as the following:

Did not contracts to didn't, as in "John didn't know where the dog went."

Could not contracts to couldn't, such as "I couldn't hear the speaker over all the background noise."

Should have contracts to should've, as in "Tracy should've brought money for the entrance fee."

It is contracts to it's. For example, "It's going to rain today, so I should bring my umbrella to work."

If you use the long form in any of the above examples, the meaning of the sentence remains the same, but the sentence is read differently — often more smoothly. Either the contracted form or the expanded form of the words are acceptable and correct to use in the sentence. The basic rule of thumb for remembering the difference between "lets" and "let's" is to only use "let's" if you intend to say "let us."

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By anon356556 — On Nov 26, 2013

Excellent explanation for a non-native speaker. Thanks!

By bythewell — On Sep 06, 2013

Whenever I'm not sure whether I should use an apostrophe or not, I just break the words apart and see if it still makes sense. So, I'll say "let's go to the park" and change it to "let us go to the park". That still makes sense, so I know that I should use the apostrophe.

I think it's a bit more difficult with the word 'let's', because it is used so often that saying "let us" sounds quite old fashioned now.

By croydon — On Sep 06, 2013
@irontoenail - I have to say that I hope not. The difference between let's and lets is fairly logical and is the same logic that applies with other word structures, like your and you're and so forth.

English is already too full of irregular words and grammar without removing perfectly logical ways of distinguishing different words.

By irontoenail — On Sep 05, 2013

I can't help but wonder if, 50 years from now, let's and lets will both be used without the apostrophe. It seems like many of the mistakes that creep into our written language over the internet are beginning to be immortalized. Recently they decided to put into one of the dictionaries that "literally" means "figuratively" because that's how people use it, even if that's not what it technically is supposed to mean.

I'm not the kind of person who minds that the language tends to evolve, but I do think it's interesting and I wonder if we will see some big changes in the next few decades or not.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.