We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is the Difference between Alliteration and Onomatopoeia?

By Mark Wollacott
Updated Jan 29, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The difference between alliteration and onomatopoeia is that the former is a repetition of sounds and the other is the description of sounds. Alliteration and onomatopoeia serve different functions within a language. Alliteration is a literary device most often used in poetry while onomatopoeia is descriptive and used in everyday language. The two are not mutually exclusive and many onomatopoeia cases are alliterative, like a clock’s “tick tock.”

Alliteration involves the intentional repetition of a sound or letter. This can take the form of a whole syllable or of a single consonant. A run of words beginning with the same letter is just as alliterative as a pair of words with the same opening syllable. Such repetition can take place in any number of languages, but is particularly prevalent in Germanic languages such as English, and especially Anglo-Saxon.

The term onomatopoeia is applied to words that describe an actual sound such as plop. Such sounds are often used to describe animal noises or the sounds of machines. Every language has onomatopoeic sounds for such things, but they rarely agree on what the sound is. Even in English, some dogs go ‘woof woof’ while others go ‘bow wow’ and some go ‘ruff ruff.’

Old English poetry used alliteration as its predominant structure. Each line of verse was divided into two half-lines. The first half-line would have two alliterative words and the second half-line would have one word alliterating with the first half-line and a final word that did not alliterate. In Anglo-Saxon and Old English poetry, alliteration and onomatopoeia were completely separate phenomena.

As English developed after 1066 and was greatly influenced by French poetry, the use of alliteration dwindled. More recent exponents of the craft include W.H. Auden, who wrote “The Age of Anxiety,” and J.R.R. Tolkien, who wrote “The Lay of the Children of Hurin.” Twentieth century free-form poetry began to use alliteration and onomatopoeia, incorporating sounds as a means of description and adding quirky rhythms to poems.

Real life and especially fictional names often end up being alliterative. These include celebrities and politicians such as Steven Spielberg, Ryan Reynolds and Ronald Regan. They are especially found in comic books, including the creations of Stan Lee, such as Peter Parker, who is better known as Spiderman. Sometimes the alliteration can be more subtle, visual rather than audible, such as British actor Sean Bean.

Comic books have played a large role in the development of alliteration and onomatopoeia. Just as Stan Lee used alliterative names for many of his characters, comic book writers and artists such as Roy Crane used words to describe sounds. This led to the popularization of onomatopoeia such as “bam,” “pow” and “dook dook.” Such sounds later made their way onto television shows such as “Batman” and movies such as “Scott Pilgrim vs. The World.”

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.