We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Spreading Activation?

By Emily Daw
Updated Feb 23, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Spreading activation is a model of working memory, also known as short-term memory, that seeks to explain how the mind processes related ideas, especially semantic or verbal concepts. The spreading activation model is one way cognitive psychologists explain the priming effect, which is the observable phenomenon that a person is able to more quickly recall information about a subject once a related concept has been introduced. According to this model, semantic long-term memory consists of a vast, interrelated network of concepts. When a person is presented with any concept, the concepts most closely connected to it are activated in that person's mind, preparing or "priming" him or her to recall information related to any of them.

According to the theory of spreading activation, each semantic concept has a node in the neural network that is activated at the same time as the nodes for related concepts. If a person is presented with the concept "dog," nodes for concepts like "bark," "beagle" and "pet" might be activated, priming him or her to think about these related words. Depending on which concept relating to "dog" is presented next, the person is able to recall any information that might be relevant to the task at hand. One such task might be to evaluate the accuracy of semantic statements. The person could, for instance, more quickly verify the statement "A beagle is a dog" if he or she already knows that the topic at hand is "dog."

The stronger the connection between the ideas, the more quickly the person is able to recall relevant information. A person can probably verify very quickly the statement "A bird is an animal," because birds are very common, typical examples of the category "animal." On the other hand, the same person would likely take significantly longer to process and verify the statement "A chinchilla is an animal," because a chinchilla is an atypical member of the category. The model of spreading activation would account for this difficulty by saying that the node for "chinchilla" would not necessarily be activated by the category "animal."

Of course, the associations between semantic concepts vary greatly from person to person. Someone who has a pet chinchilla, for example, will have far greater connections between "animal" and "chinchilla" than the general population. In this way, the semantic categories described by spreading activation are a product both the actual content and of the individual experience. For this reason, the spreading activation model is very useful for describing how the mind has responded to a semantic task, but not necessarily useful for predicting how a person will respond to any given task.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By anon937347 — On Mar 05, 2014

Funnily enough, Telsyst, there's a seminal article that remarks about exactly the same metaphor: From Computers to Anthills (by Gardenfors).

By Telsyst — On Feb 11, 2014
This is an interesting model of how the mind works. I can't help but be reminded of anthill optimization when reading this piece.

If an ant finds a trail left chemically by an ant, that ant is more likely to follow that trail. This ant will be leaving its own chemicals which makes the chemical trail stronger and so more ants will be attracted to this trail.

This optimization causes great numbers of ants to move with precision. A large number of ants could just wander off in many directions, but this keeps them in line.

The pheromones do dissipate over time, so if a trail doesn't lead anywhere, it isn't picked up by other ants, and so that trail is swept away.

A forager ant looking for food, when finding a meal, can then go back to the main group following its own chemical trail, thereby strengthening that trail. When arriving back to the main group, it will lead other ants down the same trail, leaving no chance for error.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.