We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Scapegoating?

By Brad Cole
Updated Feb 24, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Scapegoating is the practice of blaming major problems on a single individual or group while ignoring the responsibilities of others. The individual or group being blamed is known as the scapegoat, while the person or group placing the blame is the one doing the scapegoating. The term has negative connotations, and can be considered an insult depending on its use.

An argument that scapegoats someone else is easy to identify. The person scapegoating mentions an individual or group and assigns them responsibility for the problem, then usually states that their removal will help to fix it. A typical scapegoating might sound like this: “[The scapegoat] was the person in charge when these problems started. [The scapegoat] caused the problem with their actions. Once [the scapegoat] is out of the way, we can start fixing things.”

Correctly assigning blame can sometimes appear to be scapegoating, but is very different. The arguments involved in scapegoating can be irrational and often appeal to emotion; correctly assigning blame uses facts and logic. Scapegoating assigns all of the responsibility for a problem onto one group or individual; correctly assigning blame usually shows that there are many contributors to a problem, and exactly what each one has done.

Scapegoating can be used both defensively and offensively. A person can scapegoat defensively when they are partially responsible for a problem, but do not want their contribution known. By blaming someone else completely for a problem, the scapegoater’s responsibility can be hidden or can seem diminished to others. A person can scapegoat offensively when they have nothing to do with the problem, but gain an advantage over an opponent or rival if that person takes the blame. A scapegoat for a significant calamity can lose both power and status, even though they may be innocent or only partially to blame.

The term scapegoating originates from early religions, most notably Judaism. In an ancient Judaic ceremony, the sins of the people were placed onto a goat during the Day of Atonement, also known as Yom Kippur. The goat was then forced out of the village and away from the people or killed.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.