We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Qualitative Feedback?

Daniel Liden
By Daniel Liden
Updated Feb 15, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Qualitative feedback is a body of observations and responses to one's work or performance that is based on comparisons and descriptions of characteristics in a non-numerical manner. Such feedback is often useful because it allows those giving the feedback to be more specific about what they do or do not like and what they believe could be improved. Quantitative feedback, on the other hand, is based on numbers and can be used to develop detailed statistical data. Such data is often gathered through surveys asking participants to rate various facets of the subject's performance on a given numerical scale. Many forms of feedback include both qualitative and quantitative aspects.

Many people favor qualitative feedback because it provides more precise explanations for areas that need improvement or those that should not be changed. A professor, for instance, may discover from his students that he assigns too much reading and does not explain certain parts of it well enough in class. It is much easier to respond to this criticism than it is to respond to a "2 out of 5" rating in the "comprehensible" category of a quantitative feedback survey. Receiving such constructive criticism on a yearly basis, if not more often, allows the professor to refine his teaching methods based on the changing needs of his students and to receive useful feedback for any new teaching techniques he may try.

This type of feedback is not, however, always as useful for individuals in management who need to make decisions about their subordinates. Reading through pages of feedback about a professor may allow an academic administrator to get a good sense of his strengths and weaknesses, but doing so is time consuming and imprecise. Quantitative feedback, on the other hand, can supply the administrator with simple averaged numerical ratings with which to make decisions. A professor who consistently receives low scores in a variety of different categories may be subject to censure, particularly when he also receives qualitative criticism that further explains the problems in his teaching method.

Almost any profession can benefit from qualitative feedback. Such feedback may, for instance, draw a writer's attention to persistent flaws in his work. An office worker can use it to identify and correct flaws in the manner in which he does business. Even athletes, whose performance is often precisely quantified, often benefit from qualitative descriptions of the problems with their athletic performances.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.