We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Language Reform?

Dan Harkins
By Dan Harkins
Updated Jan 21, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Every modern language has undergone both hybridization and reform to become the agreed-upon means of communication for a certain group of people. When language reform occurs, it is often the result of a ruling power attempting to make a language easier to learn and more expressive of life. Language also is reformed — more incrementally and largely unnoticed — by dictionary publishers and several other media outlets, which aim to set the standard of communication in the modern age.

In just the last century, most major languages have undergone official language reform, often through crusades for more streamlined and simplified spellings. In China, the Mandarin dialect was chosen as the official language to be taught in all of the nation's schools. In countries like Greece, Germany, Somalia, Japan and Turkey, the invariable motivation behind every effort was to make language simpler and broader, in terms of how many people were using it. The United States took the helm of English reforms in 1906, when President Theodore Roosevelt spearheaded a Simplified Spelling Board, which eventually led to a Handbook of Simplified Spelling in 1920.

The book devotes two-thirds of its effort to explaining the history and principles of English language reform. The final one-third is a style guide and dictionary. Making its way to every schoolhouse, library and dictionary publisher, this in turn led to several revisions in official standards for the English language.

The precursor to this official political act, however, was academic. It was the professor-laden American Philological Association that actually made several recommendations in 1875, eventually leading to a Spelling Reform Association. Many major recommendations of the group were criticized, however, by the official federal effort just three decades later. Though "catalog" made the cut, the following words were obviously rejected: ar, definit, gard, giv, hav, infinit, liv, tho, thru and wisht.

Great Britain's politicians and academics also have been involved in language reform efforts throughout modern history. In 1908, just two years after the American Handbook was formulated, the Simplified Spelling Society was born. Prominent editors, publishers, professors, and writers like H.G. Wells made suggestions that brought more official style guides and dictionaries of English further in agreement on a range of topics.

Sometimes language reform suggestions are successful, and other times they fail. The National Education Association was successful in 1916 when it recommended the addition of a "t" to end of several past-tense words ending in "-ed." According to the Handbook of Simplified Spelling, this language reform led to the change of some 900 English words. Many of the other recommendations, however, have yet to gain acceptance as of 2011, illustrated by the recommendations for styles that allowed for words like "steppd," "linotipe" and "hoodwinkt."

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.