We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Gapping?

By G. Wiesen
Updated Feb 11, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

In gapping, a verb is removed from one clause due to its presence in another, though the meaning remains clear. A simple example of this is in a sentence like “Bob plays the piano, Lisa the guitar,” in which the word “plays” has been omitted in the second clause. The reader of this sentence is able to understand what is meant and infer the verb in the second clause, though it is completely removed. Gapping occurs in the final usage in languages that are constructed as Subject-Verb-Object (SVO), but is often found in the first clause in languages that are Subject-Object-Verb (SOV).

The importance of gapping in language is that it clearly indicates that important elements of a clause can be missing without inherently destroying meaning. This removal has to be done carefully, however, or else meaning can be obfuscated or otherwise interfered with in a sentence. For gapping to be performed properly, there should be only a single verb in use, to ensure that meaning remains clear even with a gap. For example, “I read one book last week, but my sister – two!” is clear in terms of meaning because there is only a single verb.

In the previous example, punctuation was used to indicate where the gap exists, but this is not always required in gapping. The use of two or more verbs in adjoining clauses typically makes a sentence grammatically flawed for the use of gapping, as the meaning can too easily become obscured. For example, in a sentence like “Bob learned that his sister runs quickly, his brother slowly,” there is too much opportunity for confusion. There is a gap in the final clause, but there are two potential verbs that can go there: either “learned” or “runs.” While it can be assumed that the gap is “runs,” this is a grammatically flawed sentence.

Gapping reveals quite a bit about how language is assembled and how speakers and listeners are able to use it in communication. The structure of the gap in the final part of a sentence, such as that found in English, exists in languages that are constructed as Subject-Verb-Object or SVO. English sentences typically begin with a subject, then a verb that indicates action, and finally the object it is performed upon. Other languages, such as Japanese and Korean, are constructed as Subject-Object-Verb or SOV sentences. In SOV languages, gapping is performed in the first clause, and the one that follows indicates the missing verb.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.