We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Empiricism?

By J.M. Willhite
Updated Feb 20, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Empiricism is a philosophical theory which argues that human knowledge is derived entirely from sensory experience. As a branch of epistemology, empiricism disregards the concept of instinctive ideas and focuses entirely on experience and evidence as it relates to sensory perception. Ferociously debated, the philosophy of empiricism eventually spawned additional schools which would take it to different levels of application and direction.

In the 1600s, as a response to the rationalism theory fiercely defended by Rene Descartes, the philosophy of empiricism was first put forth in John Locke's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Locke argued that the only way by which humans acquire knowledge is through experience. Expanding on Aristotle's notion of humans as blank slates, Locke firmly argued that humans are incapable of formulating or possessing inherent ideas.

Continental rationalism, empiricism's rival theory, stated that everything possesses some kind of explanation. According to the rationalists, sensory experiences did not belong in the acquisition of knowledge. To followers of this theory, knowledge was only obtained through substantive thought and only through this intellectual perception could humans gain understanding.

Irish philosopher George Berkeley was an idealist who believed that Locke's philosophical theory was dangerously atheistic. He responded to Locke's theory in the early 1700s with his Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, where he asserted that material things are composed exclusively of ideas, which is naturally a mental process. Berkeley imposed a religious tone to his version of empirical theory, referred to as subjective idealism, which stated that all that humans perceive is the idiom of God.

David Hume, a Scottish philosopher, was a staunch supporter of Locke and argued that human understanding is solely derived from sensory experience. Hume stated that knowledge is either a matter of fact, such as through direct observation, or related to an idea or theory, as applied in logic and mathematics. According to Hume, the external, physical world is not something which can be rationally deciphered or justified.

Locke, Berkeley, and Hume's notions of empirical theory remained pure until the early 1900s, when additional schools of empirical thought were established. Phenomenalism was an intense approach to empiricist theory which stated that all physical objects could be reduced to mental objects and that, ultimately, only mental objects exist. As expressed by John Stuart Mill in the late 1800s, phenomenalism was closely related to Berkeley's subjective idealism in theory and application.

Logical empiricism, also referred to as logical positivism, became a movement which attempted to combine empirical and rational thought. Science and metaphysical thought influenced logical empiricism by way of the marriage of the importance of nature and the existence of matter. The school of logical empiricism was committed to the unification of the sciences in that it argued that all scientific hypotheses should be expressed in common language for the sake of better understanding and presentation.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.