We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Double Discourse?

By G. Wiesen
Updated Feb 09, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Double discourse basically refers to two different forms of communication or expressions that are occurring simultaneously. This can happen in a number of different ways, though most simply it may be presented by a group of individuals in which two conversations are occurring within the group simultaneously. On a larger scale, double discourse can also occur at social and political levels, as an individual or group may seem to make two different and potentially contradictory statements at the same time. In literature and written works, this term can also refer to a sentence or phrase that refers to two different ideas at once.

Typically, discourse of any kind indicates communication and the expression of various thoughts and ideas between two or more people. Double discourse is an act or event in which two different forms of conversation or communication are occurring at the same time. At a party, for example, a group of six people might be gathered together and talking amongst each other. Four of the people within this group may be discussing one idea, while the other two people who are still part of the group are talking about something else. In this event, the group is engaging in double discourse and some members of it may follow both conversations at once.

There are also social and political ramifications behind the idea of double discourse, especially as it relates to public opinion and the agendas of various organizations. A politician, for example, might represent a constituency that is strongly in favor of one position, while being sponsored by a group against that position. In order to appease both groups of people, the politician might engage in double discourse. In doing so, both sides of an issue may seem to be represented by the politician, which can ultimately result in loss of support from both of them.

Double discourse can also occur in writing and literary works, which is important for anyone critically reading or reviewing such pieces. A writer may, for example, write out one sentence that seems to express a particular idea. Upon closer reading and critical consideration of the language used in the sentence, however, a reader may determine that the initial concept was intended ironically and that a secondary meaning should be taken from the sentence. Such double discourse is often used to provide readers with greater meaning from a seemingly simple sentence. This can be used to expand upon established ideas in a written work or to provide greater depth for characters within it.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By bear78 — On Mar 25, 2014

@ddljohn-- Yes, double discourse can be irony.

There are different types of irony. Generally, irony means that something turns out different than what we expected. But there are sub-categories such as comic irony or socratic irony.

Sarcasm is a type of socratic irony and it's also double discourse. When we make a sarcastic statement, we say one thing but we mean something else. Usually, sarcasm is when we pretend not to know something that we actually know.

Does this make sense or did I confuse you further? Can anyone else explain better?

By ddljohn — On Mar 24, 2014

Is double discourse in writing the same as irony then?

By serenesurface — On Mar 24, 2014

I find it very irritating when politicians engage in double discourse. When I vote and support for a candidate or politician, I expect him to stand his ground in regards to a particular issue. When I see politicians making contradictory statements from one day to the next, or when I see politicians changing their position on issues very quickly, I lose my faith in politics. I see it as hypocrisy and I do not support such politicians even if I supported them in the past. Double discourse in politics seems very dishonest to me.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.