We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Coordinated Management of Meaning?

Esther Ejim
By Esther Ejim
Updated Feb 26, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Coordinated management of meaning is a theory that was developed by Vernon Cronen and Barnett Pearce. The theory seeks to explain the types of interaction that occur between people during the social interaction process of communication. Specifically, the theory of coordinated management of meaning states that people derive or extract their own understanding of a conversation in relation to the social reality they perceive. The main purpose of applying this concept is to help people understand the situation so as to figure out how to respond.

This theory is based on the thought that those engaged in a social interaction will decide how to respond to a situation based on their perception about the meaning of their interaction. One of the perceptions associated with coordinated management of meaning is the data perceived through sight and sound. Two people in a social situation will first see each other and then size each other up. They will also hear the sound of each other’s voice and then process the data from the two modes of sensory input. The sensory input from sight could include the mode of dressing, ethnicity, height and color of hair of the other person. The audio sensory input could include things like accent, pitch and tone associated with the voice of the other person.

The next step is to process what the other person is saying so as to understand what he or she is trying to communicate. This can be done in conjunction with the manner of presentation or communication style of the speaker. For instance, two people could say the same thing to different effects due to the manner speech presentation. One person could sound more confident and persuasive, while the other might sound unsure and timid. This can affect the way the listener will perceive what the person is trying to say. A listener might be more likely to believe what a more confident speaker is saying than what a stuttering and timid speaker is saying.

The environment is also a part of the social interaction that affects the way the people perceive each other’s communication. For instance, conversation in an office during a business meeting will hold a different context than a conversation between a husband and wife held in their bedroom. As such, the perception behind any social interaction in either setting will have a different meaning to those involved.

Professionals like mediators and arbitrators whose responsibility is to try and settle disputes between parties may rely on the underlying principles of coordinated management of meaning to help them resolve disputes more effectively. Such professionals know that factors like the venue of the arbitration or mediation, and visual or audio sensory perception can affect the output of the dispute. For instance, in the mediation between an estranged couple trying to work out child custody issues, seasoned mediators will try to convince the husband to leave his mistress out of the mediation meetings since the sight perception of her will inflame the estranged wife and derail the mediation process.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.