We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Comparatio?

By Emily Daw
Updated Jan 31, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Comparatio, which is simply Latin for "comparison," is a rhetorical strategy that uses a comparison to persuade an audience. It is a form of figurative language, often a metaphor or simile, that draws on the audience's previous knowledge and experience. Most often, this rhetorical device is used to elicit a particular emotional reaction, but it can also be used to aid logical or factual comprehension of a subject. Comparatio should not be confused with compa ratio or compa-ratio, which is a method of determining a person's salary.

Effective comparatio has emotional content that is appropriate to the speaker or writer's aims. For instance, a speaker might want to persuade his or her audience that a particular ideology that is growing in popularity is having a detrimental effect. This speaker would do better to compare the ideology to cancer cells, rather than to bunny rabbits. Both have a reputation for multiplying and spreading quickly, but of course cancer has negative connotations, while rabbits are likely to be neutral or even positive.

In addition to containing appropriate emotional content, comparatio should make a comparison between items that are logically comparable. As an example, a writer might be trying to encourage a free flow of ideas that is not hampered by shyness or fear. The writer might compare a poor attitude to a flat tire on a bike, but a better analogy might be to say that a person who will not express his or her ideas is like a jar with the lid screwed on too tight. Both analogies have the appropriate emotional content — neither a flat tire nor a jar that will not open is commonly viewed as a positive — but a lid that is stuck stops something from coming out, as shyness keeps a person's ideas from coming out. A flat tire also makes movement more difficult, but in a less logically comparable way.

Using an analogy to convey factual information can also be considered a form of comparatio. A doctor might need to communicate with a patient by means of analogy, for instance, if the patient lacks the technical knowledge to easily understand the function of a procedure he or she needs. Unlike other forms of comparatio, this would not necessarily have persuasion as its ultimate goal.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.