We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is Argumentative Discourse?

By A. Leverkuhn
Updated Feb 09, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Argumentative discourse is a specific kind of communication, but one that is often broadly defined. Discourse is defined as the social or public use of written or spoken language, or in other words, communication between two or more parties. Within the general definition of discourse, several different types of discourse apply. These are sometimes also called rhetorical modes, and they fulfill different functions in general discourse.

Although many people who hear the word, “argument,” think of a heated, vitriolic conflict or emotional exchange, in general, the word simply means support for an idea. Argumentative discourse as a mode of rhetoric is discourse that primarily consists of one or more parties supporting their ideas or opinions. This is in contrast to other kinds of discourse, including narrative, expositional, or descriptive discourse.

Many different kinds of argumentative rhetoric or discourse develop and manifest in different ways. Some are more formal, in which speakers or writers carefully expand on a basic idea with key supporting ideas that are often based on technical research. Other kinds of argumentative discourse may be more broad, and rely more on intuitive or emotional arguments than on specific fact-finding. It also includes many different kinds of diction and presentation. In more formal venues, the wording used for argumentative discourse may be very sophisticated and technical, where in less formal situations, dialect and slang may be used freely.

Different kinds of argumentative discourse also rely greatly on their physical or social context. One example is the various applications of argumentative discourse to different fields or sectors of a society. For example, argumentative discourse in a court or legislative parliament is quite different from the same types of discourse in corporate board rooms. Discourse related to the legal field contrasts sharply to discourse in other fields where less technical language often applies. Another kind of context involves the relationship between the speaker or writer and the audience, where some examples of this discourse happen between live people in a room with a human audience, and others happen in the form of published work distributed to readers, as in newspaper editorials and similar texts.

In general, the use of this kind of discourse offers readers or listeners an opportunity to examine the various ideas that are being discussed. Persuasive or coercive arguments are often effective in reaching large numbers of people within a target audience. Widely disseminated arguments can often have substantial effects on the mass psychology of the public at large, whether these are measured or not. Examining arguments and argumentative rhetoric or discourse also gives listeners or readers a good idea of how this rhetorical form is treated in a given society.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By Telsyst — On Mar 05, 2014

In a world where interpersonal communication has been largely abandoned in favor of short, sometimes mindless computer speak, the ability to form and debate opinions is a dying art form.

This is why college is still a vital part of the educational process. Many argue that a well-rounded college curriculum is less important than courses geared specifically toward a chosen field of study.

However, it is not necessarily what we learn in history, literature, philosophy and other general elective classes that is important.

These subjects are important because they test our ability to digest information, make informed conclusions and defend our arguments, no matter what they may be.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.