We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is an Archetype?

Daniel Liden
By Daniel Liden
Updated Feb 25, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

"Archetype" is a broad term used to describe any given type of character, personality, symbol, or other literary device that is widely recognized and used. In literature, the term almost always refers to a type of generic character personality that appears in many literary works. The "mad scientist," for instance, is a character archetype because it is almost universally recognized and widely used. The term may, alternatively, be used to refer to the original use of an often-reused character or personality type. Archetypes are used in a variety of types of literature, but most are thought to originate in early mythology and folklore.

It is important to note that the term "archetype" can refer either to the original model on which subsequent characters and character types are based or to the generic character type used many times in literature. The first use of the mad scientist in literature was an archetype, as is every single subsequent use of that character type. A type of character used only once and never imitated, however, would not be considered an archetypal character. It is, however, quite rare for characters to be completely and totally outside of any known or previously-used character archetypes.

There are countless different archetypes used in literature, some of which are based on classifications commonly applied to real people while others could never or only rarely exist in the real world. Common archetypes, for instance, include the brooding hero, the courageous youth, the joker, and the wise old mentor. Each of these, though not necessarily common, can be connected with little difficulty to real people. An archetype such as the wizard or the evil overlord may be more difficult to connect to reality, though connections sometimes can still be made. An archetype without a strong basis in reality tends not to lose any of its effectiveness, however, as the prevalence of such archetypes makes them seem perfectly acceptable to readers.

The use of an archetype in literature can have a variety of different effects. When it is revealed that a character fits into a given archetype, the reader may be compelled to assume that every aspect of the character's personality is based on the archetypal character. For this reason, a writer may find it difficult to break away from the archetype and create a truly original character. Alternatively, a skilled writer may be able to introduce character and personality traits that force the reader to reevaluate conventional ideas of particular archetypes.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By Bertie68 — On Sep 04, 2011

@lovealot - It's fun to try to come up with some interesting archetypes. I'll contribute a few.

One archetype that comes to mind is "lover boy." I think of him as someone who smothers a woman with words of love, but in the end isn't sincere.

The rebel can be a true rebel, who is fighting a cause. Or he/she can be a rebel who is a malcontent, like a rebel without a cause.

Then there is the "crinch or the killjoy" who puts a damper on everything. He's always looking on the negative side.

Anyone else have some archetypes to share?

By lovealot — On Sep 03, 2011

@amysamp - I'm so glad we have archetypes in literature. It makes reading and writing novels and screen plays so much more intriguing.

One archetype I enjoy and notice often in literature is the born loser. I like them in a story that is somewhat humorous. i don't think anyone is truly a born loser. There's other ones that are preceded by "born" like born to be wild.

Then there's the bookworm archetype. He/she likes to be alone, wears glasses, reads a lot, doesn't smile much.

The coldhearted character has no feelings, or so it seems. He will hurt whoever he crosses paths with.

By Sinbad — On Sep 03, 2011

@amysamp - My favorite archetype is the opposite of the playboy archetype. The one that is usually being helped by the playboy archetype - the nice guy archetype. The one that is completely awkward with women, usually seeks help, tries the advice with no success but plenty of awkward stories, and then in the end finds the right girl by foregoing the advice.

But that is probably because my husband fits that type!

By amysamp — On Sep 02, 2011

Ah the archetypes. I love them. Often and by definition stereo-typical writers of books and screenplays somehow always manage to make you feel that the archetype character is still different from other characters of the same archetype secondary to the way they incorporate amazingly vivid personalities.

In fact, that is what makes or breaks a movie or book for me. If I am not caring about and curious about, wanting to know more about a character then I usually can't finish the book or movie.

And this is probably due to the archetype; by definition you usually know what is going to happen to them. For example, the mean pretty popular girl is going to have something happen in her life to have it make more meaning.

The playboy archetypal character is going to finally fall for a girl and then all of the tips he has given other men to get women he is going to have to stop doing to get the girl he wants.

My favorite archetype, are the eccentric archetypes. The person that just can't seem to fit in archetype, that by the end of a story finds kindred souls or the story begins with their group of friends and goes on to tell about their uncanny adventures.

What are some other archetype examples people are fans of?

By kylee07drg — On Sep 02, 2011

I read a book in which the main character seems to be an archetype of a crazy old lady. The writer incorporates vivid traits unique to this lady into the book after the first chapter, though, and we find that she is anything but a stereotype.

The lady had been a victim of a doctor’s clinical trial for a new drug against her will decades ago that caused her daughter, who she was pregnant with at the time, to die at a young age. As an old lady, she decides to track down the doctor and murder him.

The book follows her crazy train of thought as she finds him, befriends his family, and does little things to annoy and harm him before her plan is discovered. She is a colorful character who displays a wide range of traits. Some are archetypal, but others are just strange.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.