We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is a Lincoln-Douglas Debate?

Jessica Ellis
By
Updated Feb 03, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A Lincoln-Douglas debate, also called an LD, is a style of debate format popular in competitions and occasionally the political arena. Most center on values for one or more moral or ethical issues. The debate style is named for the famous American senatorial race debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas.

In 1858, the Illinois candidates for senate were Republican Abraham Lincoln and Democrat Stephen Douglas. The two agreed to a series of debates in various parts of the state, largely focusing on the immensely controversial slavery situation in regards to Illinois and the United States. These debates are considered to be some of the greatest in the nation’s history, and are often considered contributing factors to Lincoln’s presidential election, despite losing the senate campaign to Douglas. The original format was an hour long speech by one candidate, an hour and a half rebuttal, and then a final half hour response by the original speaker. Today’s variation is markedly different, with a rigid set of procedural rules.

A modern Lincoln-Douglas debate is divided into seven sections, closely regulated by time allowed. The issues debated are generally chosen to allow strong support or criticism through use of inductive logic and good debate tactics. The format is usually closely followed, but some exceptions do occur in certain tournaments or contests.

In a LD debate, the person speaking in support of the issue, called the Affirmative, is allowed a six minute segment to construct their argument. The opposition, or Negative, then has three minutes to ask questions of the affirmative, followed by seven minute to state the Negative case and argue against the Affirmative. The Affirmative has three minutes to cross-examine, then is allowed four minutes to rebut, using evidence from both their argument and the Negative argument. The Negative is allowed a final six minutes to rebut, summarize and plead for support from the judges, followed by a similar three minute period for the Affirmative. Including preparation time, the entire debate round takes approximately 45 minutes.

The Lincoln-Douglas debate format is most often used by high school debate teams, and a variety of tournaments exist on local and high school levels. The format also comes up occasionally in professional politics as well. Critics of the format suggest that, like standardized testing, the outcome of the debates is often determined by how well the participants construct a logical argument rather than how useful their solution may be. Critics argue that for that reason, the Lincoln-Douglas debate style is better left to competitions where learning a logical structure is an important educational tool, rather than real-world politics where solutions must not be only logical, but also realistic.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Jessica Ellis
By Jessica Ellis
With a B.A. in theater from UCLA and a graduate degree in screenwriting from the American Film Institute, Jessica Ellis brings a unique perspective to her work as a writer for LanguageHumanities. While passionate about drama and film, Jessica enjoys learning and writing about a wide range of topics, creating content that is both informative and engaging for readers.

Discussion Comments

By anon108273 — On Sep 02, 2010

I love this debate. I'm actually doing this debate for my history fair project.

By anon56632 — On Dec 16, 2009

i love this for of debating.

Jessica Ellis

Jessica Ellis

With a B.A. in theater from UCLA and a graduate degree in screenwriting from the American Film Institute, Jessica Ellis...
Read more
LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.