We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is a "Doubting Thomas"?

By Geisha A. Legazpi
Updated Jan 31, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The term “doubting Thomas” is an idiom derived from the Bible that refers to a skeptic who demands unquestionable physical or concrete proof before believing in anything. "Doubting Thomas” is specifically based on the scene in which a resurrected Jesus Christ appears in front of the apostles for the first time. At that time, Thomas, who was also known as Didymus, was not there and scoffed at his fellow apostles’ words when they told him what happened. Thomas then said that he would only believe Jesus was indeed resurrected if he could see and feel Jesus’ wounds for himself.

A week after his first appearance, Jesus once again appeared in front of his apostles and this time invited Thomas to feel his wounds. Although there was no mention made in the Bible as to whether or not Thomas accepted Jesus’ invitation, verses in the Book of John, Chapter 20, showed that Thomas had gained the proof he demanded, for he immediately referred to Jesus as “my Lord and my God.” He was the first person to acknowledge Jesus’ divinity after his resurrection and, in a complete reversal, was known after this as “Thomas the believer.” In Christian teachings, Thomas is often viewed as a pessimist. He is also often used as an example of how people should not suffer from lack of faith simply because they had not seen Jesus with their own two eyes.

The idiom “doubting Thomas” can be used in a sentence as a predicate adjective. “I used to be a doubting Thomas” or “my friend is of the doubting Thomas type” are examples of how this particular idiom can be used in a sentence. A similar idiomatic expression would be “beyond the shadow of a doubt,” which refers to unquestionable proof or evidence. It is the kind of proof that Thomas required prior to believing that Jesus was indeed resurrected.

This biblical scene has also been used as a subject of famous works of art. In 1511, the great German painter Albrecht Dürer created a masterpiece that was known as "The Doubting Thomas". This painting was part of a series of 36 images that were all created by Dürer. In 1602, Caravaggio, one of the most famous painters from the Baroque period, also used this biblical scene as the subject of his painting "The Incredulity of Saint Thomas". Most people simply refer to this painting as Doubting Thomas.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.