We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Is a Dependent Clause?

By D. Coodin
Updated Feb 12, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

A dependent clause is a part of a grammatical sentence that contains both a verb and a subject, but does not convey a complete thought. While an independent clause is sufficient to make a sentence on its own, dependent clauses need to be connected to independent clauses to form sentences. Also called subordinate clauses, they often begin with words such as prepositions that indicate their dependence on other elements in a sentence. When used properly, dependent clauses are helpful for varying sentence length and writing style.

Often, this type of clause contains a marker word at the beginning, such as "after," "although," "before," "unless" and "until." These marker words are often prepositions, but not always, and make the clause dependent on another thought to complete it. For example, the clause "When the sun sets over the city in the evening" requires more information to answer what occurs when this event takes place. An independent clause can usually be turned into a dependent clause by adding one of these marker words to its beginning.

As a rule, dependent clauses need to be connected to independent clauses to be made into a complete sentences, which can be accomplished in a variety of ways. A writer can use a comma to do this, for example, "When the sun sets over the city in the evening, shadows appear on the sidewalk." Also, writers can use a comma followed by a coordinating conjunction, such as, "and," "but," "for," "or," "nor," "so" or "yet." An example of this type of connection would be, "He wanted to go outside, but it was too cold," where the second clause is a dependent clause. A dependent clause can also be connected using a semicolon and an independent marker word, such as, "also," "furthermore," "however" and "moreover."

There are many mistakes that writers often make when relating to dependent clauses in a sentence. One of the most common is the sentence fragment, in which this clause is erroneously written as a complete sentence, as in, "Because it was too cold outside." Another common mistake is the comma splice, in which two independent clauses are separated by a comma when a dependent clause is necessary. For example, the sentence "He wanted to go outside, it was too cold" contains two independent clauses. The insertion of "but" after the comma makes the second into a dependent clause and completes the thought in a way that is grammatically correct.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By OeKc05 — On Aug 01, 2012

In fiction novels, sometimes authors start sentences with “but.” Is this grammatically acceptable, or does it always make the words following it a dependent clause?

For example, one author wrote a really long descriptive sentence about the scary, dark night out in the forest. She followed that up with this short sentence: “But the little boy was not afraid.”

I'm unsure whether or not this would qualify as a dependent clause. On one hand, if it were taken out of the paragraph, away from the preceding sentence, it would not make any sense, so it is dependent on that sentence. On the other hand, it could have been the second half of a compound sentence.

By StarJo — On Aug 01, 2012

@giddion – I think you're right. The fact that the clauses have subjects and verbs confuses some people who don't have a good grasp on grammar.

I'm pretty good at it, but still, I remember being confused from time to time by multiple choice questions on achievement tests. We would have these tests at the end of every school year, and the reading and writing section would often have questions that made us choose which example was a complete sentence.

We would have four answers to choose from, and at least one of the answers thrown in to confuse us would be a dependent clause. At first glance, it might sound like a sentence, but our teacher taught us to always ask ourselves if we could understand the sentence without further information. That helped me identify dependent clauses and distinguish them from sentences.

By feasting — On Jul 31, 2012

This article made me think of the sentence fragment that my mother used to always say to me. I heard, “Because I said so,” so many times throughout my youth!

At the time, I never considered that this was a dependent clause, but I did notice that it left me wanting more of an explanation. I wanted to ask her why she said so, but all she would reply with was, “Because.”

I do realize that in order to make this a full sentence, she would have had to reiterate what I already knew. She would have had to say, “You can't spend the night with your friend, because I said so.” So, it really wasn't necessary for her to be grammatically correct.

By giddion — On Jul 31, 2012

I hate it when people use dependent clauses alone and think that they are complete sentences. I don't see how they cannot tell that the clauses cannot stand alone without further explanation.

My only guess is that because a dependent clause has both a subject and a verb, some people are confused. Maybe the rule that in order to be a sentence, a clause must have both of these is the only thing that these people remember from grammar instruction in school.

Even if I see this in a casual email or a quick text, it bothers me. I don't point it out at the time, because that would make me seem like a jerk, but I do cringe.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.