We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Does It Mean to Be "in the Know"?

By Jacob Queen
Updated Feb 05, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

If someone claims to be "in the know," that person is generally suggesting that he or she has access to information that isn’t available to the rest of the public. This kind of access is often claimed for government information, company information, or in regards to secret tips and tricks in a certain area of skill. People can sometimes be skeptical when they hear this term used by a random person, because it’s generally well-understood that people sometimes claim to be "in the know" as a way of garnering prestige and making people believe they are more knowledgeable than they actually are.

Generally speaking, using the term requires a situation where there is some level of secrecy. This is why government information is a common context, since people normally believe that there are top-secret government projects and other possible areas where some facts may be kept from the public. The idiom is also usually applied to situations where the secret-keeper is a large and monolithic entity, like a government or a large company, but this isn’t always the case.

Some people claim to be "in the know" because they have information on the practice of a prestigious skill that hasn’t been shared. For example, a particular athlete might have a special workout routine that allows him to outperform other people, and if he were to keep this routine mostly secret, the few people he told about it would be "in the know." In a case like this, the list of people who actually knew something might include the athlete’s closest friends, his coaches, and maybe his teammates. If those people started sharing the information, it would eventually become common knowledge, and once it stopped being a secret, using the term wouldn’t generally apply very well.

When someone claims to be "in the know" there can sometimes be a lot of skepticism because it is often very easy to make the claim without having to back it up until much later. This sort of fraudulent utilization of the idiom has generally become even more common since the Internet became widespread because online communities often provide an additional layer of anonymity. On the other end of the spectrum, some reporters and other people in the information business are especially famous because they actually are "in the know," and these people may go to great lengths to protect their sources so that they can maintain that status.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.