We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What does "De Facto" Mean?

Mary McMahon
By
Updated Jan 30, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The phrase “de facto” is Latin for “in fact.” It is used to describe commonly accepted practice which has no legal or official status. For example, English is the de facto language of Australia, meaning that it has no formal legal status, but most citizens speak English, and English is used on government documents. By contrast, something mandated or authorized by law is said to be “de jure,” or “in law.”

This phrase is used in a variety of ways, including politics, government, and sociology. Many people use the term to refer to situations of questionable legality or morality. For example, the United States endured decades of de facto racism after several laws were passed in an attempt to make racial prejudice illegal. Racism persisted so long in some regions of the United States because it had become common practice, and legislation alone was not enough to put an end to racism.

It is fairly common to see a de facto standard, a tradition which is followed without any legal basis. For example, many businesses have de facto hiring standards which are not explicitly stated, such as a preference for employees who look a certain way. In some cases, such a standard may be illegal, but because it has not been formalized, it is difficult to prosecute.

De facto standards often reflect commonly-held opinions about women, racial minorities, and the disabled. Because many people in a society may share these ideas, it can be difficult to identify patterns which suggest that a government or industry is using such a standard, making it hard to challenge the standard. In nations where laws are in place to prevent or reduce discrimination, many people are also very careful to avoid revealing the existence of a de facto standard. For example, if a business decides it does not want to hire women for a particular position, it will find legitimate excuses to deny the job applications of women so that it cannot be accused of discrimination.

Activists who fight discrimination often claim that de facto discrimination is the hardest to fight. De jure discrimination can be eliminated by re-writing or throwing out old laws, and creating new ones to address the changing face of society. However, when the letter of the law is not upheld by common practice, citizens may see little difference after a struggle to eliminate de jure discrimination.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Mary McMahon
By Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a LanguageHumanities researcher and writer. Mary has a liberal arts degree from Goddard College and spends her free time reading, cooking, and exploring the great outdoors.

Discussion Comments

By anon299263 — On Oct 24, 2012

Please, could you tell me what a de facto monarch means?

By momtocfd — On Jan 30, 2011

In an office setting, ignoring the defacto rules can really be an issue. Often it is assumed these are actual rules and certain people can be greatly offended when they are not followed. This can include anything from dress to where to eat lunch. For example, if the defacto rule is that you take a fifteen minute lunch in the office then work through the rest of the break, but the actual rule is that there is a full hour lunch available, some employees might be really put out if a new employee decided to take the full lunch hour. It is wise to research defacto policies as well as actually policies when starting a new job, if you desire success.

By mitchell14 — On Jan 26, 2011

The idea of a de facto law, or unwritten law, is another problem in many societies. People will say that they have "always done it this way" for anything from what types of people get hired, to what types get accepted into a college, to what foods are eaten or clothing is considered acceptable. Sometimes these are just silly, but sometimes the de facto way of doing things can be really harmful to people.

Mary McMahon

Mary McMahon

Ever since she began contributing to the site several years ago, Mary has embraced the exciting challenge of being a...

Read more
LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.