We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Does "Close but No Cigar" Mean?

By T. Carrier
Updated Jan 29, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

"Close but no cigar" is one of many English sayings characterized as an idiomatic expression. In general terms, the saying means close to success or nearly correct. It likely derives from a comparison to games played at American fairs in the mid-20th century.

Like many similar expressions, the words in the phrase do not describe an actual physical action or object. Rather, the expression is used in a symbolic sense, representing an idea or thought. Such literary techniques are known as idioms, and they typically consist of a comparison between the literal expression and the idea or thought presented.

The actual terms in "close but no cigar" likely refer to the American fairgrounds of the mid-20th century. Many booths were set up at these grounds where individuals played a game in order to win a prize. During this era, cigars were a common prize given by fair vendors. If an individual did not beat the game, then the vendor might say "close" or "nice try, but no cigar."

In these cases — just as with the modern expression — the words were meant to indicate an endeavor that was almost completed, but ultimately was not completely successfully. One contemporary example might occur when an individual goes for a job interview. If the applicant makes it to final rounds of interviews, but the position is ultimately given to another applicant, then someone might say that the unsuccessful individual's attempt was "close but no cigar." In this case, the "cigar," or prize, would have been the job. Usually, the negative outcome is compounded by the fact that no reward or compensation is given for the effort.

A slightly different interpretation of the phrase might happen if one is seeking an answer to some question or problem. In seeking the correct idea, an individual might put forth a proposed answer or solution. If this hypothesis proves almost correct but still not quite right, then it might be said that the proposal was "close but no cigar."

This saying is believed to have originated in the United States because it first appears in American popular culture. A 1930s cinema version of Annie Oakley’s life contains the phrase “Close, Colonel, but no cigar.” American newspaper reporters also frequently used the phrase in following decades.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By mrwormy — On Jan 20, 2015

One of my math teachers in high school would always say "Close, but no cigar" if someone got a problem wrong while standing at the blackboard. We'd all have to look at the steps he or she took and figure out where it went wrong. He wasn't going to tell us how to get the right answer, but he would say "ding, ding, ding" when we finally did.

By AnswerMan — On Jan 20, 2015

I've always considered the origin of "close, but no cigar" to be related to carnival fairs, and I've never heard of any other theory. I'd be interested to see if other theories do exist, though. To me, being close to the right answer at least lets me know I'm on the right track. I'm sure those people who played those midway games also wanted to know if they were at least in the neighborhood of the right target.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.