We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What Does "Blow the Whistle" Mean?

By Alicia Sparks
Updated Jan 31, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Generally, the idiom “blow the whistle” means someone has disclosed or reported a corrupt or dishonest situation. A person who does this is often referred to as a “whistleblower.” Both sayings are thought to derive from the days when police officers or other law enforcement officials would blow their whistles to signify an illegal activity. The phrases might also have ties to referees, who blow whistles to alert sports players to an illegal move. Whistleblowers might report to the authorities or any person or entity in a position to end the negative situation.

To blow the whistle on a situation means to report it and bring it to light. Usually, the whistleblower reports to the authorities, which are often law enforcement officials. Depending on the situation, though, the authorities might be employers, teachers, or parents. For example, if one student knows another classmate, or group of classmates, is planning to steal the answers to a test, that student might blow the whistle to his teacher. Likewise, if an employee knows a co-worker has been embezzling money from the business, he might blow the whistle on his employer.

Sometimes, whistleblowers blow the whistle to the media. From private citizens who have stumbled across a misuse of public funds to a high-level business executive who knows his company’s owner is committing tax evasion, all manner of people choose to do this. Sometimes, this is because they know the media can shine light on the situation, especially if it is a situation of public interest and the person feels he has no one left to report to. Other times, a person blows the whistle to the media because he wants to make the biggest impact possible, whether for personal or public reasons.

Although blowing the whistle on a corrupt situation is often considered a good thing, the term “whistleblower” sometimes carries a negative connotation. This might be because, along the way, people started using the word to describe not only people who blew the whistle on dishonest situations, but also people who told any kind of private business. Too, some people have come to view whistleblowers as people who want to be viewed as martyrs or “do-gooders.” Even though it is not always the case, people often assume whistleblowers are “tattle tales” or that they are only blowing the whistle to bring praise or attention to themselves.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.