We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What are Heuristics and Biases?

Michael Anissimov
By
Updated Feb 17, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Heuristics are "rules of thumb", cognitive strategies people use to make selections in the face of data overload. For example, an employer might use the heuristic "long hair means the person is a flake" while making hiring decisions. As in the case of the previous example, heuristics don't always work effectively. Some heuristics lead to systematic errors that can be experimentally isolated -- hence they are labeled biases.

The most common and illustrative example of a systematic bias is to overassign probabilities to conjunctions. Try the following:

Linda is 31, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in philosophy in college. As a student, she was deeply concerned with discrimination and other social issues, and participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations. Which statement is more likely?

a. Linda is a bank teller.

b. Linda is a bank teller and active in the feminist movement.

When combined with other options to throw the test-taker off, the majority of people actually pick b, even though the probability of b (a conjunction) is surely lower than the probability of a, which is a superset of b. But our minds automatically work this way. Various heuristics and biases seem to be built into the way our human mind works.

Try another:

Estimate the product of the series:

9 x 8 x 7 x 6 x 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = ?

vs.

1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 = ?

Experimental studies have confirmed that estimates are strongly biased towards the first series. In a study that required participants to give their answers within five seconds, the average estimate for the first series was 4,200, and for the second series, only 500. The real answer is 40,000. Everyone radically underestimated the real answer.

This bias is called anchoring -- fixating on what comes first, and insufficiently adjusting as more data comes in. In a sales context, salespeople will often show a customer a more expensive product, then adjust downwards incrementally. This makes all the products seem cheaper, and is a very effective sales strategy that exploits universal human heuristics and biases.

Bayes' rule has often been cited as a way of making predictions mathematically and normatively, freeing decision-makers from the threat of biased decisions. Unfortunately, applying Bayes' rule in everyday contexts can be difficult for those who are not explicitly trained to do so.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Michael Anissimov
By Michael Anissimov

Michael is a longtime LanguageHumanities contributor who specializes in topics relating to paleontology, physics, biology, astronomy, chemistry, and futurism. In addition to being an avid blogger, Michael is particularly passionate about stem cell research, regenerative medicine, and life extension therapies. He has also worked for the Methuselah Foundation, the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, and the Lifeboat Foundation.

Discussion Comments

Michael Anissimov

Michael Anissimov

Michael is a longtime LanguageHumanities contributor who specializes in topics relating to paleontology, physics,...

Read more
LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.