We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

How Reliable Are Grammar Checkers?

Dan Cavallari
By Dan Cavallari
Updated Jan 22, 2024
Our promise to you
LanguageHumanities is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At LanguageHumanities, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Many writers are often tempted to simply hit the button for grammar checkers on the word processing program when they finish writing a document, and call the document ready for reading. Unfortunately, grammar checkers on word processing software tend to be unreliable in many cases, sometimes going as far as to change a word that was correct in the first place to an incorrect word. Sometimes these grammar tools are sufficient to accurately check the document for errors, but in most cases, a writer will need to proofread the document even after the grammar tool has been used.

Writers who are composing a work of fiction are more likely to encounter problems with grammar checkers. Fiction writers tend to use sentence fragments, words that mimic sounds but are not actually words at all, or even words misspelled on purpose. A grammar checkers will attempt to change all these errors because they assume the conventional rules of writing are being followed. These grammar tools cannot tell the difference, in other words, between a work of fiction and a work of non-fiction; they cannot tell the difference between figurative language and literal language, and they cannot tell when the writer is using poor grammar and syntax on purpose or when he or she is making mistakes.

Some words are spelled similarly, and grammar checkers may not know which word the writer intended to use. The checker can, therefore, change the word from one that the writer meant to write into one that was not meant to be written. The checker cannot read the word in context with the rest of the sentence in some cases, meaning it will make corrections that end up being errors. The writer will need to watch the grammar check carefully to ensure these errors don't occur, and once the checker finishes its job, the writer will still need to proofread the document to look for errors.

Sometimes grammar checkers are exceptionally useful. Extremely short documents can be proofread quickly with the checker, and the reader can then read the document quickly to ensure it is ready to be read by others. The writer will still, however, need to proofread to ensure the grammar checker has not made any unintentional errors. Grammar checkers can also make layout and formatting corrections the writer had not intended; extra spaces between words will be cut down, even if the writer does not want it, and extra spaces between paragraphs may be altered as well.

LanguageHumanities is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

LanguageHumanities, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.